|
|
Letter to the Editor
The Ottawa Citizen
1101 Baxter Road
Ottawa, ON K2C 3M4
Review of the Police Complaints System
In June, the government appointed the Hon. Patrick J. LeSage, Q.C.,
former Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Ontario, to review the
system by which citizens may complain about the services provided by
police or the conduct of police officers. The Police Act was last
changed in 1997. The system has suffered a credibility and
transparency problem ever since. The complaint system is at the
heart of public confidence in police. It’s also important for the
police themselves because they rely on ready cooperation from the
public in performing their job.
The following suggestions would go a long way to enhancing that
confidence:
• The biggest weakness of the current system, - that complainants
must complain to, and accept that their complaints will be examined
by, the very organization about which they are complaining – must be
changed. Complaints administration should be taken from the Chief’s
responsibility and made a responsibility of the local Police
Services Board.
• Appeals of proposed complaint resolutions could be made to the
local Board. Should the local Board decision prove unacceptable, a
second level appeal would be referred to OCCOPS – the Ontario
Civilian Commission on Police Services.
• The current system should be simplified. It’s now complicated
because complaints must be classed as regarding either (a) the
policies or services provided by the police force or (b) officer
conduct. This leads to different appeal streams, serves no useful
purpose and can lead to confusion for everyone. Unnecessary and
distracting problems arise when one incident results in complaints
falling into both categories, or complaints are worded in such a way
that causes incorrect classification.
• The Act should allow for the submission of a complaint to the
local Board. Currently, complaints must be filed at a police station
or sent to the Chief. An alternative does exist but it is to OCCOPS,
not to the local Board. Simple reception of a complaint at a Board
meeting has the potential for diffusing a tense situation and,
properly handled, need not compromise the Board’s role in the
complaints process downstream.
• Boards need a monitoring tool if they are to set appropriate local
policies with respect to complaints resolution or possibly avoiding
the type of complaint in the first instance. The Act should require
Boards to receive brief summaries of all complaints and their
resolution. Such reports should be in the public domain. Privacy
concerns may be addressed by removing individual identifiers. It is
important that the nature of the complaint and its disposition be
clear. Policies are not created in a vacuum but rather proceed from
the specific to the general.
• More emphasis should be given to ensuring that Board members truly
understand their crucial oversight role. Training is far from
adequate. The training that occurs does not focus on, or stress, the
importance of maintaining an arms length oversight relationship and
independence of the Board from the Police Service.
None of these changes would require the expenditure of additional
moneys.
Prior to 1997, Ontario was considered a world leader in the matter
of dealing with police complaints. Re-instating the provincial
‘Office of Police Complaints Commissioner’ could reclaim that
leadership position. Its major failing was that complaints took too
long to resolve. Correcting this would require more resources than
are currently provided and probably more resources than was
previously allocated. I have little expectation that this would find
favour within the current political climate. Curiously, there would
appear to be nothing preventing the current OCCOPS from filling this
former function, apart from the resource question. Its mandate,
interpreted broadly, and with few modifications, would appear to
encompass the roles of the former “Office of the Complaints
Commissioner”. The six modifications of the Police Act suggested
above could have almost the same result, as restoring the Complaints
Commissioner, yet at no additional cost or overhead. They would
immeasurably increase the credibility of the complaints system over
the current situation and enhance the role of local Police Services
Boards.
My years on the Board of the Ottawa Police Services were an
enriching and positive experience. It was a privilege to contribute
to an important and stabilizing element of our society. My ongoing
interest in the field is a result of the consideration that I have
for the officers, men and women, who are charged with one of the
most difficult roles in a modern society. We are fortunate, in this
country, to have a high standard of excellence amongst our law
enforcement officials. It would be unfortunate if that led us into
complacency.
Jacques Legendre
Councillor
Rideau-Rockcliffe
back
to index
|
|
TERMS |
SITE MAP
ADD THIS SITE TO YOUR FAVOURITES
© 2007 councillor JACQUES LEGENDRE,
all rights reserved.
last updated on
2007-09-19
|
|
|